ext_2132 ([identity profile] tsukinofaerii.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] cap_ironman 2009-10-21 03:59 am (UTC)

Oh, seated next to Pym Particles and the Fantastic Four, the plot device is totally fair--I think those tend to get a pass because they're such old stories. My major argument with the Tachyon thing is that it feels retconned--a large chunk of the first issue explaining "what really happened" didn't help that. From a marketing standpoint (like you said, a jumping off point for the new Cap fans), the flashbacks are needed. But from a storytelling standpoint, it feels like wasted space. I can't shake the feeling that they could have used it better. If it is that Steve needs to remember who he is, then that point completely passed me by, which is a shame because that could have made me like the flashback scenes a lot more.

I sort of feel a little cheated on the Tony thing. Tony is such a huge part of Steve. Cutting him out feels like they're missing something important. Even having just a brief, no-dialog shot of him in issue three was a giant relief on that angle. I would take more of that in a heartbeat. With what's going on in Iron Man, it's completely possible that we won't have Tony when Cap does finish coming back, or at maybe not a Tony capable of having a reunion. I think that makes the fandom a little nervous about Cap's story. It definitely makes me nervous!

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org