ext_22754 (
savemoony.livejournal.com) wrote in
cap_ironman2010-02-09 12:45 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Spoilers For Cap Film
March 1, 2010 is the deadline for casting Steve Rogers. According to wired.com:
Johnston expects to name the film’s star within the next couple weeks, drawing from a short list of six actors up for wielding Cap’s shield. “The youngest is 23,” Johnston said. “The oldest is 32. Most of the guys in the war are just kids, 18 or 19, but we want to go a little bit older.”
BigShinyRobot.com has reported that:
According to MY studio guy, the rumors about Chad Michael Murray (One Tree Hill), Ryan McPartlin (Chuck), Jensen Ackles (Supernatural) and other unknowns/television actors reading for Cap are true.
Apparently, when the script came in with World War II sequences (featuring the Invaders), the studio heads decided it was beyond their means to make this movie AND afford A-listers like Brad Pitt and Matt Damon.
Sure sounds like everyone’s high on McPartlin, who evidently just lost out on the Superman role to Brandon Routh.
Folks should take the Big Shiny Robot information with a grain of salt. It actually came out before Johnston's interview. McPartlin is 34; meaning if we take Johnston's comments as The Word Of God, McPartlin is out. Moreover, this is the first confirmation I've seen that's Jensen Ackles read for the role.
Now... Now onto script spoilers.
The LA Time's Hero COmplex blog interviewed Joe Johnston. Johnston revealed how Steve Rogers gets his mythic costume:
"The costume is a flag, but the way we're getting around that is we have Steve Rogers forced into the USO circuit. After he's made into this super-soldier, they decide they can't send him into combat and risk him getting killed. He's the only one and they can't make more. So they say, 'You're going to be in this USO show' and they give him a flag suit. He can't wait to get out of it."
"So he's up on stage doing songs and dances with chorus girls and he can't wait to get out and really fight. When he does go AWOL, he covers up the suit but then, after a few things happen, he realizes that this uniform allows him to lead. By then, he's become a star in the public mind and a symbol. The guys get behind him because he embodies something special."
There will be more than one costume in the film, too.
In the first USO sequences, the frustrated patriot will be wearing a version that is closer to the classic Jack Kirby-designed costume, but then later as the super-soldier hits the war zone he will be wearing a sturdier, more muted version that he makes himself that is more like battle togs. The stripes across his mid-section, for instance, will be straps, not colored fabric.
"He realizes the value of the uniform symbols but he modifies his suit and adds some armor, it will be closer to the Cpa costume in some of the comics in more recent years . . . this approach, it's the only way we could justify ever seeing him on a screen in tights, with the funny boots and everything. The government essentially puts him up there as a living comic-book character and he rips it off and then reclaims some of its imagery after he recognizes the value of it. We think it's the best way to keep the costume and explain it at the same time."
Johnston confirmed there will be tie ins to Iron Man and Thor, and the modern will have modern day book ends. IGN (and multiple other sources) are reporting the director revealed that The Invaders will "be in the entire second half" of the film. IGN is also reporting that Red Skull will be the Big Bad.
On a happier note, Robert Downey Jr is awesome. Downey Jr recently told SFX Magazine:
"The Avengers" [is] a culmination of the first four years of movies from Marvel Studios. It's the pinnacle, but only if it's done in the smartest and best and most creatively sound way possible. And I'm not saying we can't get there. I'm just saying it would be better to get there and not stay on schedule than to get everyone what they were hoping for in terms of a release date but not do it correctly. And by correctly, I mean my way," laughed Downey.
no subject
I don't even... (goes into a corner to
bitchcomplain stridently)no subject
Well, seeing as they want to do an ensemble movie with the Avengers, and their already cast, well-established, and much-loved Tony Stark actor is in his forties, I do hope they don't go with the 23-year-old. I doubt it would stop me from slashing (with that source material how could I not slash), but the one being old enough to be the other's father would change the chemistry and balance of their relationship.
Apparently, when the script came in with World War II sequences (featuring the Invaders), the studio heads decided it was beyond their means to make this movie AND afford A-listers like Brad Pitt and Matt Damon.
Well, good. I'd love a new (or at least not too well-known) face in the role. And, as much as I love Jensen Ackles in Supernatural, I do not want him as Steve Rogers. Sure, hair and eye colour can be changed, but whoever they cast, I want him to be built, as in huge, muscles and height.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
My thoughts exactly. Having Steve in his early 20s would be... upsetting. :/
And, as much as I love Jensen Ackles in Supernatural, I do not want him as Steve Rogers.
He would do an awesome job, but... no.
I'd really, really, really like to see him as Bucky, though. I realise that he's too old for the role, but... hell. He would be perfect. (Maybe in the Avengers?)
Anyway, some months ago at a Spn convention he said he wasn't interested in the role - if he did read for Cap it was a nice bluff. Smart move.
(no subject)
no subject
"He realizes the value of the uniform symbols but he modifies his suit and adds some armor, it will be closer to the Cpa costume in some of the comics in more recent years . . . this approach, it's the only way we could justify ever seeing him on a screen in tights, with the funny boots and everything. The government essentially puts him up there as a living comic-book character and he rips it off and then reclaims some of its imagery after he recognizes the value of it. We think it's the best way to keep the costume and explain it at the same time."
I think this is a good idea. I could totally see the government doing something like that (it even makes a certain amount of sense -- they wanted an army of supersoldiers, but if they only have one, obviously he's too valuable to put out in the field. So they need to get their money's worth out of him another way) and to be frank, Cap's costume is silly. He has little wings on his head. I'm not trying to be a hater here. My favorite costumed hero of all time, the Flash, has little lightning bolts on his head, and wears red pajamas. I kind of like the silly. But it's not a very practical look for live combat, and I like the idea of an exploration of that conflict between showmanship and practicality.
I don't know any of the possible casting choices from Adam (not even Jensen, though I guess he must be doing something right if he has this many rabid fans) so I'll be waiting until we see some trailers to comment on that. I don't mind that they're thinking about casting a slightly older actor for Cap, though -- considering his backstory, I think it could be made to work. And I totally agree with RDJ that they should let the deadlines take care of themselves and focus on making some awesome movies. XD
no subject
I just don't get it. :\
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I do not like this at all.
no subject
This is just supposition on my part, but didn't the British Empire, for the most part, fight people with less advanced technology? If you have gatling guns, and the other side has rifles if they're lucky, an impractical costume wouldn't make as much difference as it would if you were fighting a technological equal, like the Allies were.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
And the way it's being talked about..makes it seem like they'll have Steve be reluctant to take on the title of Cap. Which, I dunno, doesn't sit well with me. I like Steve as the super patriotic frail kid-turned-hunk of burning
lovejustice.I'm tired of jaded heroes.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Oh, RDJ
I already spoke at length in tsukino's LJ, but to be fair, the original Captain America story is pretty hokey, and what with Cap's patriotism, it can be taken as jingoism to an international audience - and this movie isn't just for a domestic audience but an international one. Note the fact that GI JOE the movie had the team as an international fighting force instead of US based. So yeah... I can see why the powers that be are doing what they do.
I like the aspect of the USO "you gotta get up, you get up this morning... " and having Captain America as a branching out for that.
Personally, I'd have made it a mashup of Ults and 616. Or just do his origin story like they did in Ultimate Avengers the cartoon.
As much as I like Steve Rogers, I don't know if I'd sit down for a Captain America movie at all.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
If the shield is part of the 'act' that he is trying to desperately leave, will he initially hate the shield? Will he throw the shield? I have to admit, throwing a shield in combat is something that works in 616, but not in the real world. If they're trying hard to make this not feel comic-booky, will Cap throw his shield?
no subject
Oh, probably he has the kite shield in this? And then in the future he gets the awesome one. Possibly after, in the finale of this, chucking his shield to gain advantage at a key point.
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Given there are the Invaders though, thinking yes Bucky.
Not that I think any of the other Invaders will resemble themselves.
no subject
This is one of those things that sounds GOD AWFUL in writing, but if I tune down my freaking out, I can almost see the logic in it AND it's all concepts they've used in comics to some degree, even if it was one-shots like The Chosen (in that AU the military did have major issues allowing Steve into combat and he basically went AWOL. actually the idea was in another four part comic too, and that wasn't AU).
He's never been in the USO, but it does explain the outfit, IMHO a lot better than the idea that the military would ever create it. Granted in the four part mini, it was based on Steve's art doodles, but they could still keep that and go with the USO.
Sooooo given that's not much of the plot at all really, I might live with it as a set up.
I'm actually more upset about the Invaders. They won't do them right, so why bother (and by they won't I mean they already said they wouldn't)
no subject
you're damn right. he wore ridiculously tight leather pants. <3 MUCH better than tights.
no subject
not sure how i feel about the majority of the news, here, but you should post this over at
no subject
no subject
I hope they do like they did with nu!Kirk and get a relatively unknown in the role. That would be cool and cause less problems with casting, methinks.
Jensen Ackles as Hawkeye though... that I am all over like a bad rash in a weird place, oh yeah. Unf.
no subject